Please comment on draft #mLearning #mhealth project- Building Resilience Interest Group BRIG using this blog post.
I post ideas and thoughts about Health promotion/public health here and look forward to having professional conversations. I am particularly interested in the impact of Web 2.0 on our practice.
Labels
#Change11
(1)
Authenticity
(1)
barriers
(5)
BJ Fogg
(1)
Change11
(1)
Collaboration
(3)
Communities of Practice
(3)
community of practice
(1)
Competancies.
(1)
Competences
(1)
Connecting With Kids
(1)
connectivism
(1)
Craig Lefebvre
(3)
Craig Thomler
(1)
Cultural Competency
(1)
Digital Footprints
(1)
e-portfolio's
(1)
evaluation
(1)
Evidence Brokering
(1)
evidence dessimination
(1)
F2F
(2)
Facebook
(2)
facilitators
(5)
Gov 2.0
(1)
Gov 2
(1)
HBHMs
(1)
Health 2.0
(1)
Health Promotion 2.0
(8)
implemetation
(1)
Learning goals
(1)
Learning Outcomes
(1)
Mhealth
(1)
Mobile learning
(3)
MobiMOOC
(6)
MP3
(1)
Netiquette
(1)
NEYONDS
(1)
Ning
(1)
Online Personal Brands
(1)
Physical Activity
(1)
Project Management
(1)
Public Health 2.0
(2)
Reaching agreement
(1)
Relationships
(1)
Reputation
(1)
Risks
(4)
SEEDS
(1)
SIG
(1)
Skype
(1)
Smart Phones
(1)
Social Capital
(1)
Social connection
(1)
Social isolation
(1)
Social media
(3)
social network media
(2)
Stocktake
(1)
Town Hashtag
(1)
Training Needs Analysis
(4)
Twitter
(2)
Web 1.0
(2)
Web 2.0
(10)
wicked problems
(2)
Wise and united action
(1)
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
BRIG-MOBIMOOC course- Draft Mobile Learning MHealth Project
Labels:
Health Promotion 2.0,
Mhealth,
Mobile learning,
MobiMOOC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Malcolm, this is some HUGE project! I have read your outline twice, but I must say it seems very complex to me as an outsider. After reading your challenges, I will give you my two cents worth for some of your challenges:
ReplyDelete• How to managing risks to participants who have mobile phone plans that will incur great expenses if they use more than a little mobile data: Using a wifi seems inevitable to avoid costs, you could set-up a wireless router in those areas that have an internet accesspoint, which will allow a (dispersed) mobile data transfer to occur. But ideally participants have to be educated in mobile data transfer risks.
• How to blend constructivism with connectivism and community of practice in coherent ways.
• Understanding mobile devices operating systems issues and tech restrictions on various mobile devices: I would try to work around this by using those apps that are as-good-as mobile platform independent (like FB, twitter) or follow the W3C mobile standards ( http://www.w3.org/Mobile/ ).
• How to develop digital materials to stimulte and sustain learnings conversations (tough one! Someone mentioned using the soap-opera format (Phil or Andreas?) to keep everyone engaged, I liked that idea).
• How to re-purpose learning materials (develop them in a sustainable digital format, and make them scorm, look at ADL for the scorm: http://www.slideshare.net/jhaag75/scorm-implementation-strategies-for-mobile-4630923
• How does Moodle works and fit with mobile devices and cope with orgamisational firewalls (difficult one, I have been co-working on mobile moodle for iPhones and it was a challenge, normally Moodle2.0 will roll out mobile options later in the version).
• How to help informal students negotiate their way through technologies such as Moodle.
• How to work with partners to manage a change from an expert role as “sage on the stage” to “guide on the side”.
• How to explain these new paradigm of of health promotion practice to my own organisational managers who may be unsure of such emergent and unproven mlearning/mhealth practices.
• How to evaluate this as a health promotion intervention.and as educational intervention.
Fascinating and ambitious project. Good luck.
ReplyDeleteWould suggest trying to get a much simpler graphic to explain your vision. It would help communicate what the Community of Practice would look like - what identity the members would have and so on. However, I presume you have a pretty good idea, in Darling Downs, as to who would be involved. They would recognise themselves yes?